Are alternative funding plans a good idea?

نویسندگان

  • M J Jacka
  • B Milne
چکیده

M Godwin and colleagues are to be congratulated for their survey of the effect of an alternative funding plan on physician referrals; however, we have several concerns. First, the authors state that to interpret the “negative perceptions” of the respondents regarding the alternative funding plan one should “consider the confounding effect of other changes in the health care system in Ontario.” A control group should have been selected. Reductions in health care allocations in Ontario are not exclusive to the academic centre studied. Second, a null hypothesis would be that physician referral would not be affected by changes in funding. However, 39% of the surveyed physicians sent fewer patients to the study’s tertiary care institution, and 37% sent more to the tertiary care (nonstudy) institutions. Although we realize the limitations of post-hoc analysis, this shift is probably nonrandom. Moreover, the consultant physicians at the nonstudy centres who were already dealing with cutbacks were now forced to cope with an increased caseload deferred from the study centre. Fortunately, some physicians within the study centre opted out of the alternative funding plan and assumed a major increase in referral work, according to the authors’ data. Third, the authors infer support for the alternative funding plan among referring physicians by commenting that “only 39% ... indicated that they would not want to be part of an alternative funding plan.” This is a confusing interpretation. Their results show that only 35% of the referring physicians stated that they would want to participate in an alternative funding plan. Finally, the alternative funding plan is a funding experiment, requiring more bureaucracy, implemented without evaluative plans. For a publicly funded enterprise, citizens have the right to ask about the “value-added” features of this new bureaucracy. In the absence of unequivocal evidence of benefit, would it not be reasonable to terminate the experiment and restore the previous system?

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Importance of Publishing Negative Results

1. Scientific thinking is not always open minded and without bias; accepted theories can be hard to overthrow—and I am referring here to scientists, not the general public. Publishing only selective information, i.e. positive results, does not allow one to visualize/understand the whole of the situation. However, by publishing negative data or results that contradict the establish way of thinki...

متن کامل

Chapter 5 From Brainstorming to Structuring to Evaluation and Choice Brainstorming

Brainstorming Abandoning the bogsat for compensatory2 decision-making with AHP is sometimes too big a first step for some organizations. Instead, a series of small steps might be easier to implement. An easy and prductive first step is to encourage the seeking out of several alternative solutions to a problem or opportunity rather than settling on the first one that seems feasible. Since most p...

متن کامل

Analyzing the Preferences of Knowledgeable Citizens towards Alternatives in Emergency Products: A Study on Alternative Treatment Services in Sylhet City, Bangladesh

The present study aimed to examine the determinants of using alternative treatment plans in different types of problems by different educated professionals to facilitate in formulating the appropriate marketing strategies of the most important emergency product- Medicare service providers. This paper attempted to find out the attitudes and behavior of educated professionals in adopting differen...

متن کامل

Should Corporate Pension Funds Invest in Risky Assets?

Whether defined-benefit corporate pension plans should invest in risky assets has always been subject to debate, and the risky pension asset allocation frequently causes concerns. In this study, we model corporate pension decisions in a setting where a firm balances its risk management concern with employees’ preference for systematic risk exposure. For a reasonable set of parameter values, the...

متن کامل

An Update on Tobacco Control Initiatives in Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans

INTRODUCTION Comprehensive cancer control (CCC) coalitions address tobacco use, the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, through formal plans to guide tobacco control activities and other cancer prevention strategies. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs (Best Practices) and The Guide to Community Preventive Services (The Community Guide) are used to ass...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

دوره 161 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999